In my last Musings, I addressed the claim of government scientists that 2016 was the warmest year on record. In my writing I said that the fact that it was government scientists making the claim should give us all reason to be skeptical. It now appears that my skepticism of government claims was well placed. A former NOAA scientist has now come forward as a “whistle-blower” to state that government scientists altered data to make it show warming and then rushed a report so that it would be published with strategic timing to support the Paris global warming accord touted by President Obama. The government scientists then hid or destroyed the altered data so that independent researchers could not confirm the accuracy of the data.
It appears that a number of the Republican “elite” have bought into the climate change hysteria, because it has been reported that these GOP elites have approached President Trump with a proposal for a carbon tax to “confront the problem of climate change.” One of these elites is reported to have said that he was not certain he accepted the notion that we are on the precipice of doom from climate change but it does not hurt to be proactive in dealing with the problem. What utter nonsense. He wants to take more money from Americans to fund a solution to a problem that does not exist. This is further evidence that the U.N. has been successful in selling the world a ‘bill of goods” based on a science that does not exist. We keep hearing people like Bernie Sanders tell us to “believe the science” when it is clear that they have not even bothered to read the “science” for themselves. They are only reacting to what they are told the “science” says.
The reality is that there is no science behind global warming. All that exists are hypothesis, altered data, and computer models based on the altered data. That is not science. The “science” says there should be a hot spot in the upper atmosphere because of heat “trapped” by CO2. After three decades of searching, scientists have never found the “hot spot”. Furthermore, a gas cannot trap anything, especially in the upper atmosphere. In the upper atmosphere the molecules are much further apart because they are dispersed over a wider area.
There is no empirical evidence that CO2 is linked to global warming or any catastrophic climate event in the recent past. Those of us who are skeptics do not deny that the earth could be warming. But we attribute the warming to natural events, such as solar activity, the tilt of the earth, the earth’s rotation around the sun, etc. Walk outside on a sunny day with dark clothing and what do you notice? You start warming because your clothing is absorbing the solar energy. What happens when a cloud gets between you and the sun? You start to cool because the water vapor in the cloud blocks and filters the solar energy. Water vapor is a “greenhouse gas” as is CO2. There is more water vapor in the air, even on cloudless days, than CO2, in fact 96% more. The moral of the story is that the greenhouse gases prevent the planet from over heating, because they filter and block harmful solar radiation..
CO2 is not a pollutant. It is an essential element for all life on the planet. Plants require CO2 to live and thrive. We require plants to live and thrive. At 400ppm, the current level of CO2 in the atmosphere, plants are almost starved for CO2. If we reduce CO2 back to 290 ppm, we will be retarding the yields of food plants. This is not a good idea while the world population is growing.
Back to the “science.” In science one does not alter the data to fit the hypothesis. If the data do not fit the hypothesis, the proper thing to do is change the hypothesis.